Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WIP:Accessible name labels for case list check boxes #1810

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Jan 15, 2025

Conversation

StoneBenHMCTS
Copy link
Contributor

Before creating a pull request make sure that:

  • [ x ] commit messages are meaningful and follow good commit message guidelines
  • README and other documentation has been updated / added (if needed)
  • tests have been updated / new tests has been added (if needed)

Please remove this line and everything above and fill the following sections:

### JIRA link (if applicable) ###

Change description

Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (check one with "x")

[ ] Yes
[ x ] No

@StoneBenHMCTS StoneBenHMCTS changed the base branch from master to branch_frm_d80548e_before_QM November 15, 2024 12:41
@olusegz07 olusegz07 force-pushed the branch_frm_d80548e_before_QM branch from 1ba5a5b to b22fa0f Compare December 12, 2024 14:50
@StoneBenHMCTS StoneBenHMCTS changed the base branch from branch_frm_d80548e_before_QM to master January 3, 2025 16:01
@StoneBenHMCTS StoneBenHMCTS dismissed andywilkinshmcts’s stale review January 3, 2025 16:01

The base branch was changed.

@StoneBenHMCTS StoneBenHMCTS changed the title WIP:retries this fix on a 3rd branch WIP:Accessible name labels for case list check boxes Jan 3, 2025
Josh-HMCTS
Josh-HMCTS previously approved these changes Jan 3, 2025
Josh-HMCTS
Josh-HMCTS previously approved these changes Jan 15, 2025
@RiteshHMCTS RiteshHMCTS merged commit 1932149 into master Jan 15, 2025
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants